Environmental Aspects and Impacts
Related Documents
- Register of Environmental Aspects and Impacts
- Register of Environmental Legislation
- Communication of Environmental Issues
- Management Review
Purpose
The environmental aspects of Royal Free London Property Services (RFLPS) operations must be identified and assessed to determine those that are the most significant. This then enables resources to be focused on addressing specific aspects. ISO 14001 requires this to be an on-going process. Therefore, the aspects must be reviewed on a regular basis to ensure that all current aspects have been identified and that they are correctly prioritised.
The register of environmental aspects and impacts aims to provide documentary evidence that demonstrates compliance with these requirements.
Scope
This document embraces the identification and assessment of significance of environmental aspects arising from activities, products and services of RFLPS. It also considers those activities, products and services over which RFLPS has only limited control (indirect aspects), but some influence.
Responsibilities
The environmental aspects of RFPL's activities, products and services were initially identified via the compilation of an inventory of inputs and outputs as part of the initial environmental review. This inventory was subsequently developed into a register of environmental aspects by the Management Team, guided by an environmental consultant.
In subsequent years, any changes or additions to the environmental aspects will be decided on an annual basis through the Management Review.
Definitions
Environmental aspect - 'Element of an organisation's activities, products or services that can interact with the environment'.
Direct aspect - an interaction with the environment over which RFLPS has control and over which it can be expected to exert an influence
Indirect aspect - an interaction with the environment over which RFLPS does not have control and cannot be expected to exert an influence
Environmental impact - 'Any change to the environment, whether adverse or beneficial, wholly or partly resulting from an organisation's activities, products or services'.
Procedure
The various activities of RFLPS are documented in the Environmental Review.
Notes
- ISO 14001 suggests that selected activities, products and services should be large enough for meaningful examination and small enough to be sufficiently understood.
- The methodology for assessing significance is outlined below
Register of Aspects and Impacts Review
The Register will be reviewed:
- As part of the annual management review
- As a consequence of any amendments to RFLPS's activities, products or service
- As a consequence of any relevant changes to the register of applicable legislation
- As a consequence of any related non-conformities raised during the internal or external audit process
- In response to stakeholders' reported and documented concerns
Identification of Environmental Aspects
Identify the inputs and outputs to and from your activities and then identify the environmental aspects and impacts that arise from these inputs and outputs. This should include (where applicable) identification of direct and indirect environmental aspects and those aspects arising from abnormal or emergency conditions.
To assist in the identification of RFLPS's environmental aspects process flow diagrams may be used.
The identification process shall cover the aspect categories listed and shall consider the findings of the Initial Environmental Review. It should be noted that not all categories will necessarily be applicable to all sections or all stages of a process.
The identification of aspects and impacts will take into account how the environmental aspects might be affected by change, abnormal conditions, emergencies and life-cycle perspective.
Identification of Environmental Impacts
Suggested environmental impacts to be considered:
- Air Emissions
- Water Emissions / Discharges
- Releases to Land
- Resource Use / Raw Materials
- Use of Energy
- Generation of Waste
- Energy Emitted (Noise, Heat, Odour, Vibration)
- Ecology
Assessment of Environmental Aspects
- Record each environmental aspect in the Aspects Register
- Aim to determine which identified environmental aspects are significant
- Each aspect can occur under normal, abnormal or emergency conditions
- Each aspect is scored to assess significance and prioritization
- Scoring is based on "Severity" and "Likelihood"
- Each aspect should also be relevant to our objectives and targets
Severity Scoring Methodology
Severity = Legislation & Regulation + Environmental Impact + Stakeholders & Reputation
Legislation & Regulation Scoring
Is the aspect covered by legislation, regulation or other requirement?
Score | Description |
---|---|
5 | Regulation /legislation applies |
4 | Potential to be regulated |
3 | Corporate Policy |
2 | Voluntary / DEFRA guidelines apply |
0 | Not regulated |
Environmental Impact Scoring
What are the environmental consequences of the aspect?
i. Effect on the receptor - does the receptor (air, water, etc) deteriorate and can it recover from the damage? Or is the impact irreversible?
ii. Quantities involved - what is the scale of the business activity? Is it great enough to warrant action?
Score | Description |
---|---|
5 | Extreme: Severe ecological damage or resource use |
4 | High: Uncontrolled emissions or significant resource use |
3 | Moderate: Controlled emissions, moderate resource use |
2 | Minor: Minimal emissions, reduced resource use |
1 | No consequence: Virtually no environmental damage |
0 | Positive impact: Favourable to the environment |
Stakeholders & Reputation Scoring
Is the aspect a source of concern for our stakeholders or reputation?
Score | Description |
---|---|
3 | National adverse publicity |
2 | Local adverse publicity |
1 | Internal adverse publicity |
0 | No adverse publicity / positive publicity |
Likelihood / Frequency Scoring Methodology
Score | Description |
---|---|
5 | Very high usage / Constant operation |
4 | High usage / Frequent operation |
3 | Moderate usage / Normal Operation |
2 | Low usage / Normal Operation |
1 | Negligible usage, Infrequent operation |
Overall Significance Scoring Methodology
An aspect’s total score for “Severity” is multiplied by the likelihood of the aspect occurring. The overall significance calculation is therefore:
Significance = (Legislation & Regulation + Environmental Impact + Stakeholders & Reputation) × Likelihood
Sorting the Results
Significance Value | Significance Description | Symbol |
---|---|---|
< 30 | Not significant | ![]() |
30 - 50 | Significant | ![]() |
> 50 | Highly significant | ![]() |
- Aspects can be ranked in descending order of significance
- Aspects with a positive environmental impact will have a low score
Controls
Opportunities for identifying relevant procedures and methods of control include:
- Environmental control procedures
- Compliance with environmental control procedures
- Environmental control methods
- Knowledge of an impact
- Maintenance of associated machinery
- Records of an Environmental Impact
- Environmental awareness training
- Accident and emergency training
- Monitoring of environmental aspects and impacts
- Compliance with minimisation initiatives
Identification of Direct or Indirect Control
The EMS Co-ordinator must determine if RFLPS has Direct or Indirect control of the environmental aspect.
Identification of Normal, Abnormal and Emergency Conditions
Conditions are defined as: - Normal (N): Day-to-day activities or processes - Abnormal (A): Periodic or irregular activities associated with main process - Emergency (E): Unexpected events like accidents or random occurrences
Records
Register of Environmental Aspects and Impacts
Version | Date | Title | Author | Approver | Review Date |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.1 | 03-12-2024 | Identification and Assessment of significance of environmental aspects | Nigel Walker | Draft | |
1.0 | 14-01-2025 | Identification and Assessment of significance of environmental aspects | Nigel Walker | ISO Working Group | 15-01-2025 |
Changelog
Version | Change(s) |
---|---|
0.1 | Initial draft based on template provided by R. Widdows |
1.0 | Approved by ISO Working Group |